Sublime Sites

Explorations in the footsteps of Turner, Cotman and Ruskin with Professor David Hill

John Constable, David Lucas and ‘A Summerland’: Part #3 – The Progress Proofs [d]

This is the third in a series of articles in which I discuss a recently-discovered progress proof of the mezzotint of ‘A Summerland’ made by David Lucas for John Constable in 1829.

Fitzwilliam study room

In the study room of the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge
Photograph by David Hill, taken 19 September 2018

Here I continue a collation of the many stages through which the engraving evolved to publication. This involves concentrated tracking of changes to the image and working out the order in which they occur. It’s not likely to appeal to everyone, but then the wider public has almost completely lost sight of the work, artistry, consummate skill and sheer endeavour that goes into the production of a hand produced engraving. Today, images proliferate almost infnitely, and most without any material substance. Constable’s ‘Summerland’ belongs to an age when all images were hand produced, hard won and highly crafted objects. More even than that, the art of hand producing and printing engravings was at its absolute peak. Within a few short years the process was industrialised and automated and overtaken by new image technologies. For now, however, these prints bear witness to some of the greatest heights that this particular image craft ever reached. It more than deserving of some effort of appreciation.

Shirley spine

[see Part#2 for states a-c]

Shirley state (d)

When Lucas next touched this plate it was to again increase the dramatic activity in the sky. Up until now the plate remained close to the original painting that Constable had provided, but from now on the sky became a new conception altogether. In what follows I start with state (d) as given by Hon Andrew Shirley in his book , ‘The Published Mezzotints of David Lucas after John Constable’, Oxford, 1930, and find room to add six new states to that before his next, state (e). This represents the most crucial phase in the development of the image.

382144001 BMd

David Lucas after John Constable
A Summerland, 1829
Mezzotint, printed in black ink on paper
Image, 150 x 224 mm, on plate 177 x 251
British Museum, London, (1842.1210.104)
Image courtesy of the British Museum and ©Trustees of the British Museum

Shirley’s next state (d) is identified with an impression at the British Museum, which is listed in their online catalogue as BM 1842.1210.104. Like state (a) described above, this was bought by the Museum from Constable’s friend and patron James Baker Pulham, only five years after the artist’s death.

Shirley itemises the changes thus: ‘d Same size. Diagonal clouds, pencil of diffused light added, l. The tower added on hill r. Signature distinct.’

The most obvious differences are in the sky. There are now dramatic crepuscular rays upper and lower left, centre left and across the entire undercloud area along the horizon. In addition there is an extensive area of cirrus cloud in the open sky upper left, and extensive linear underlighting of the clouds across the whole of the composition and extensive lightening of the sky above the horizon, especially in the centre and to the right.

BMd detail of buildings left

BM 1842.1210.104
Details of buildings left

In the landscape there are several enduring changes that may be tracked through later impressions. On the horizon towards the left there is a new white building immediately at the centre of the ray of light. This reinstates a building that was there in states (a) and (b), but lost in state (c). On the right horizon is a new tower with a highlight at its tip.

BMd detail build right

BM 1842.1210.104
Detail of new building right

In the middle distance the lights on the fields have been strengthened; to the left immediately above the sheep and further off beyond the cows, and there is a similar heightening of the contrast in the middle distance centre.

The most important difference in the foreground is the introduction of a new light on the back of the central ploughman. This brings him into more dynamic play in the composition. Apart from that there are a couple of new lights in the trees cutting the horizon at the extreme left, the light stoke of the distant river has been lengthened and brightened and a there is a slight reduction of the right-hand light in the light building below right of the new tower towards the right.

The signature is still plainly readable.

Shirley (d) also mentions ’A proof touched in white chalk to show changes in sky. – Horne’ Shirley pp.155-6 speaks of: ‘The very fine collection, also made during the dark ages of Lucas’s reputation by the late Mr H P Horne, was unhappily catalogued in haste a few days before it was dispersed at auction; the present writer regrets that, for this reason and since it was the first collection with which he attempted to deal, he cannot claim complete reliability for his notes on it, except in those cases where he was able to see the proofs again at the Metropolitan Museum, New York.’ Only one of the Met’s ‘Summerland’ prints was accessioned before 1930 (25.51.15), but the provenance of that does not mention Horne. That is, however touched with chalk, and wants consideration later, rather than here.

d (i)

The next state was unknown to Shirley, and is represented by an impression offered by Gerrish Fine Art in 2018

Summerland d LG 2018

David Lucas after John Constable
A Summerland, 1829
Mezzotint, printed in black ink on paper
Image, 150 x 224 mm, on plate 177 x 251
With Gerrish Fine Art, London, 2018,-john-(1776-1837),-‘a-summerland-(rainy-day;-plougman-noon)’,-mezzotint,-1829.~2057.

This is described by Gerrish’s online catalogue as Shirley’s state (d) but there is sufficient new work to the plate represented by the British Museum example (1842.1210.104) to constitute a different state and warrant a separate numeration.

The landscape forms are unchanged, but there is considerable new work in the sky. There is some elaboration of the lights at the upper left, more work in the cirrus clouds upper left, trails of cirrus in the right part of the open sky, darkening and dramatizing of the sky above the horizon from the centre to the right, new work in the central clump of cloud, the bridge between it and the right clump, and more work towards the right in the right-hand clump.

Signature still visible at lower right

Gerrish Fine Art’s website also archives a second impression of this state that once belonged to H.P.Horne,

This state brought the composition to a high degree of resolution and refinement, but Constable was still not satisfied.

Another impression of the same state is at the Fitzwilliam Museum (P1383-R) but touched with white chalk and graphite to indicate changes. Constable adds a new crepuscular ray towards the left, eliminates the lower strands of cirrus in the open sky, and seeks to lighten again the right-hand horizon.

Nor, significantly, is the signature visible in this impression. It has presumably been blotted out by Constable, but the instruction was not heeded immediately, for it is retained at least through a couple more states.

d (ii)

Met 40.9.5

David Lucas after John Constable A Summerland, 1829 Mezzotint, printed in black ink on paper Image, 150 x 224 mm, on plate 177 x 251 Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (40.9.5) Image courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

Shirley did not know of an impression at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York (40.9.5). This was bought by the Museum in 1940 from the dealer Knoelder, who in turn had it from the British collector John Charrington. In 1910 Charrington was the source of the core collection of proofs at the Fitzwilliam Museum. These appear to have descended from David Lucas to H S Theobald. Quite how or why this has a separate Charrington provenance is unknown.

This impression represents a strike immediately after the revisions proposed in the Fitzwilliam touched proof (P1383-R). The underside of the crepuscular ray to the left of centre has been lightened as indicated, the cirrus upper left has been toned back, and that to the right of the open sky eliminated. The sky towards the right horizon has been much lightened, and a bright streak introduced behind the right-hand tower, and at the extreme right is the first appearance of a distinct upturn to the undercloud, which persists throughout the subsequent states.


Metropolitan Museum (40.9.5) Detail of right side including upturn of cloud

The most striking new work, however is to be found in the central clump of cloud bridging across to the right half of the sky. Here the new work is bold and unresolved; still raw upon the plate.


Metropolitan Museum (40.9.5) Detail of new work in central part of sky

The signature is still clearly visible at the lower right.

d (iii)

There are still several states to be considered before Shirley’s next (e).

V&A E819.2016

David Lucas after John Constable A Summerland, 1829 Mezzotint, printed in black ink on paper Image, 150 x 224 mm, on plate 177 x 251 Victoria & Albert Museum, London, 819.2016 Image courtesy of Victoria and Albert Museum

This impression represents a major revision of the state represented by the Metropolitan museum impression. Most obviously there is a lot more work in the sky.

There are numerous enduring changes of detail and emphasis. There is a huge variety of new highlights and detail in the sapling to the left of the plough, in the hedge and pollarded tree as well as the whole range of trees across the mid-distance.

In the middle distance at the left the stream has been made more prominent and two cows added in the meadow below it. To the right of centre this impression features the first appearance of very small tower on the horizon right of centre. Further right, the tower introduced in our state 6 has been reduced in size by eliding the highlight at its tip.

V&A E819.2016 detail of right horizon, with new and reduced towers

V&A E819.2016 Detail of right horizon with new and reduced towers

The major work is in the sky. The rough new work in the Metropolitan Museum impression has been softened and ameliorated, and the crepuscular rays multiplied better defined, and mingled with drifts of rain, both by being lightened with a burnisher and darkened with a fine roulette and drypoint. The prominence of the rays against the dark cloud and as they fall to the ground is greatly increased. Most obviously there are light streaks of cloud now against the darker cloud mass to the left, and the continuation of this into the open sky centre is much more detailed and defined. There is a new patch of dark tone in the cloud to the right, which is softened in subsequent states.

Signature still visible at lower right.

d (iv)

V&A E818.2016

David Lucas after John Constable
A Summerland, 1829
Mezzotint, printed in black ink on paper
Image, 150 x 224 mm, on plate 177 x 251
Victoria & Albert Museum, London, 818.2016
Image courtesy of Victoria and Albert Museum

This is a comparatively lightly inked impression, which lacks the tonal richness and power of most others, but in compensation exhibits an astonishing clarity of detail in the darker areas, greater than any seen thus far. Looking back through previous states, it seems obvious that most, if not all, of the shadow detail has been present since the earliest states. It is just that the plates tend to be densely inked in the darker areas.

This impression represents a refinement of V&A E819.2016. There is more work softening and melding in the sky.


Metropolitan Museum 40.9.5
Detail of plough team

V&A E819.2016 detail of plough team

V&A E818.2016 Detail of plough team

V&A E818.2016 detail of plough team

By now it is apparent that the central horse is being progressively lightened. Because of the variations in the degree to which the different proofs are inked, it is hard to be certain exactly to what degree the lightening occurs in each state. Suffice it to say that in the Metropolitan Museum proof 40.9.5, the horse is definitely brown. By the V&A proof E819.2016 it is definitely white, and by Fitzwilliam Museum P139.1954, it is distinctly so. Between The Metropolitan Museum proof and V&A 819 Constable seems to lighten the rear quarters; in V&A 818 he lightens the whole horse, and in Fitzwilliam Museum P139.1953, lightens it still further.

Signature still visible at lower right, albeit not so clearly as in previous versions.

d (v)

Fitzwilliam Museum P139.1954. Posterior to V&A E818.2016, since the central horse now made emphatically white, the white building at right now toned down and likewise the trunk of the large tree at left. On the horizon the prominence of the light church towards the left has been reduced by toning down its ancillary building. This is a very well inked impression, perhaps overly so, especially in comparison to V&A E.818, and the darks are rich and velvety, which makes the light horse very much the focal point of the whole composition, and the chiaroscuro very much more dramatic and structured. There is a corresponding loss of fine detail in the shadows, but this seems to have been Constable’s certain intention, for looking back at the lighter V&A impression the attention seem completely distributed and distracted, and as a result the force of the composition as a whole dissipated into its (albeit beautiful) details.

d (vi)

The Fitzwilliam Museum has another impression (P140.1954) that is almost identical to P.139.1954 except for the first introduction of three stones in the foreground and a few extra lights in the hedgerow towards the right. Another significant difference is that the signature bottom right is now elided.

Met 40.9.6

David Lucas after John Constable A Summerland, 1829 Mezzotint, printed in black ink on paper Image, 150 x 224 mm, on plate 177 x 251 Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (40.9.5) Image courtesy of the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

The Metropolitan Museum has an impression (40.9.6) that was unknown to Shirley. This was acquired in 1940 from the dealers Knoelder and bears the blind stamp of the well-known British collector John Charrington.

This appears almost identical to Fitzwilliam P.140.1954, except for the fact that it has been extensively touched with white chalk (or watercolour). These marks appear to call for extensive work around the white horse’s tack, the far horse, and across the large tree left and the trees in the middle distance, as well as in the ray at the top left. None of these changes appear to have been attempted by Lucas and none of the subsequent states up to publication show any extensive new work in those areas.

d (vii)

The Fitzwilliam Museum has yet another impression P1384R, which also appears identical to P.140.1954, except for the first appearance of a light slipped stroke towards the left. This feature is not mentioned by Shirley with regard to any state, but is easily found to the left of the dark tower vertically cutting the horizon and distant hillside at the foot of a light crepuscular ray. This remains persistent in all subsequent states up to publication. . I do not yet have permission to reproduce the Fitzwilliam proofs, so the image below is from the next in sequence Shirley state (e) but serves here as a marker for the first occurrence of this feature.

BMe detail of slipped stroke left

British Museum 1846,0130.15
Detail of slipped stroke below left horizon; first visible in Fitzwilliam Museum P1384-R

The signature is elided, but perhaps faintly traceable.


Key image Part 2

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: